Calculus Taylor Approximation Proof

Elvin Rivera
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Member warned about deleting the template
1. The question is. Show that if |nx| <1, the following is exact up to (and including) the x^2 order. The hint giving says to use the Taylor Expansion for both sides of the equation2. (1+x)^n = e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) ; the n(x-(1/2)x^2) is all an exponent3. My first attempt was to take the taylor series of both sides. The left hand side is pretty easy.

1 + nx + (n/2)(n-1)x^2 = LHS

the right hand side gives the same thing though

f(0) = RHS = 1
f'(0) = n(1-x)e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) = n
f''(0) = -n*e^n(x-(1/2)x^2 + n^2 (1+x)^2 * e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) = -n + n^2

which in the taylor series gives the same as the LHS

1 + nx + (n/2)(n-1)x^2 = RHS

but now I'm stuck... how do I show that |nx| < 1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Elvin Rivera said:
1. The question is. Show that if |nx| <1, the following is exact up to (and including) the x^2 order. The hint giving says to use the Taylor Expansion for both sides of the equation2. (1+x)^n = e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) ; the n(x-(1/2)x^2) is all an exponent
Then use parentheses to make that clear: (1+ x)^n= e^(n(x- (1/2)x^2)).
3. My first attempt was to take the taylor series of both sides. The left hand side is pretty easy.

1 + nx + (n/2)(n-1)x^2 = LHS

the right hand side gives the same thing though

f(0) = RHS = 1
f'(0) = n(1-x)e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) = n
f''(0) = -n*e^n(x-(1/2)x^2 + n^2 (1+x)^2 * e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) = -n + n^2

which in the taylor series gives the same as the LHS

1 + nx + (n/2)(n-1)x^2 = RHS

but now I'm stuck... how do I show that |nx| < 1
You don't- that is not what is asked. You are asked to show that if |nx|< 1 then that equality is true, not the other way around.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Then use parentheses to make that clear: (1+ x)^n= e^(n(x- (1/2)x^2)).
You don't- that is not what is asked. You are asked to show that if |nx|< 1 then that equality is true, not the other way around.

Any hint on how to start that?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top