Can 16 Credit Hours with a Lab Overwhelm a Math Major?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SMA_01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Load
AI Thread Summary
Taking 16 credit hours, including a lab, may be challenging for a math major, especially without prior programming experience. Familiarity with coding concepts such as state and flow-control is essential for success in the Computer Science course. A solid understanding of statistical principles will aid in managing the workload, particularly in Economic Statistics and Applied Regression Analysis. Preparation for Real Analysis, including mastering delta-epsilon definitions and convergence concepts, is crucial. Overall, careful consideration of prior knowledge and study strategies will determine if this course load is manageable.
SMA_01
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Is this too much of a load??

I'm thinking of taking 5 classes this Fall semester:

Real Analysis 1
Economic Statistics
Applied Regression Analysis
Computer Science 1 with lab
Marketing Principles and Policies

Total would be 16 credit hours (CIS is 4 credits). I'm a math major with a minor in applied stats. Do you think this would be too much of a load?

Any input is appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hey SMA_01.

Two questions: 1. Have you done any coding in any procedural language for any purpose of moderate complexity (MATLAB, R, C/C++, BASIC, FORTRAN, Python, Whatever) for CompSci and 2. Have you done courses involving a substantial amount of proving before for the Analysis course?

If you really understand statistics and in both an applied and mathematical context, then you should be good IMO.
 


Chiro- I've never had any prior experience in programming, this is my first course. I took Abstract Algebra last semester, but I wouldn't consider that a "substantial" amount of proving. Do you think I'm still okay with taking classes?
 


SMA_01 said:
Chiro- I've never had any prior experience in programming, this is my first course. I took Abstract Algebra last semester, but I wouldn't consider that a "substantial" amount of proving. Do you think I'm still okay with taking classes?

For programming remember two things: state and flow-control.

Your state correponds to the variables you use, how you use them and what's in them and the flow-control corresponds to how the execution of your program operates on those variables.

Procedural is top-down in the context of the scope: for example in a loop you go back to the start until you terminate. If you branch you decide whether to skip the branch or enter it and with function calls, you call a function and then the start of the function goes down to the end.

If you remember this, it's going to be a lot easier to follow what is going on.

If you are stuck think about these things and they will make more sense.

In terms of the analysis course, at least get prepared with all the delta epsilon stuff: if you haven't touched much of that then take a look at it. Be aware of the tricks used, the properties of norms, relationships between different norms (like triangle inequality, minkowski inequality and so on) and then look at these in the context of convergence, the existence of limits, differentiability, and continuity.

You might want to get a feel of these concepts (i.e. differentiability, continuity, and convergence) in the formal definition (i.e. all that epsilon delta stuff) before you go into the course.

Once you have a good enough understanding of when to pick your delta's, your epilsons and so on, you will be in a lot better shape and hopefully won't be pulling your hair out.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Back
Top