Can a beam with supports at each end support any weight?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the stability of a beam supported at both ends and its ability to support weight without toppling. Participants agree that while the beam can remain in equilibrium as weight shifts, it has a limit beyond which it will fail or break. The principle of moments is crucial in understanding this balance, but practical applications require knowledge of material strength and load distribution to determine the maximum weight the beam can support before toppling occurs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the principle of moments in physics
  • Knowledge of beam stability and equilibrium
  • Familiarity with material strength and load distribution concepts
  • Basic mechanics of structures and forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "beam stability analysis" to understand factors affecting load capacity
  • Study "material strength properties" to determine how different materials behave under load
  • Learn about "load distribution techniques" for beams in practical applications
  • Explore "toppling criteria in structural engineering" for insights on stability limits
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, civil engineers, structural designers, and anyone interested in the mechanics of beams and load-bearing structures.

Talha
So basically i was solving this question about moments amd while solving it i noticed that beam will always remain balanced as FA will decrease and FB will increase as the man moves forwards thus plank alwats remains in equilibrium but now the question is can it support any weight without toppling? If no then how can we figure out in practical situations that how much the beam can support a weight or how much is it stable?
 

Attachments

  • 1511698129098120537029.jpg
    1511698129098120537029.jpg
    38.1 KB · Views: 605
  • 1511698489805800395693.jpg
    1511698489805800395693.jpg
    28.4 KB · Views: 606
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "toppling"?
 
A real plank will break if you add too much weight.
 
There must be something deeper, intended by the OP than just the principle of moments, surely. There is no way one would imagine than the either end of the beam would move upwards, wherever you stood on it. Give us a clue, @Talha
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
569
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K