Can a Big Crunch Happen in an Open Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JC380
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the FLRW model of the universe, which describes three types of curvature: flat, closed, and open. A big crunch is traditionally associated with closed universes, but recent cosmological insights suggest that an open universe could also experience a crunch if certain conditions are met. The understanding of these models has evolved significantly since 1998, with the mainstream view now emphasizing a small positive cosmological constant (Lambda). Outdated literature that adheres to the old models can mislead readers, as current research indicates that the value of Lambda is still being studied. Speculation about changing Lambda affecting an open universe remains uncertain and is not supported by current evidence.
JC380
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have read from online sites and in books about the FLRW model which provides curvature to the universe via math problems. In the three models, there is a flat universe which is equal to zero and will have the same fate as an open universe, a spherical universe which is greater than one and will have the same fate as a closed universe and a negatively curved universe which is less than one and will have the same fate as an open universe.

My question is, since a big crunch is more than likely to occur in a closed universe, can it still occur in an open universe if the right conditions occur?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Your information is out of date, JC.

A universe which is spatially closed, for instance space being a hypersphere---being spherical, as you said---does not have to undergo a crunch. It can expand forever at an increasing rate.

The mainstream view changed in 1998. Before that, people would talk in terms of those three types you mentioned. The "open", the "flat", and the "closed". In those old, pre-1998 discussions, the "closed" model always ended in a crunch.

You should probably trash any books that give that outdated view, and get rid of any online material that presents those three types like that. Cosmology has changed a lot since 1998. The obsolete books and articles can confuse people.

First learn cosmology in the standard case assuming a small constant positive Lambda (which the data suggests) and then if you want speculate about what would happen if Lambda was gradually changing (but so far no clear evidence of this.)

Yes, if Lambda changed very radically it could make an "open" universe eventually crunch. But that is very speculative and iffy. The current value of Lambda was only measured for the first time in 1998 and people are still studying it and taking more data to pin it down. Too early to consider it anything but a small positive constant.
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top