B Can a Binary Number be Viewed as an Orthogonal Basis?

entropy1
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
72
Could you view a discrete number, for instance a binary number, as a sort of orthogonal basis, where each digit position represents a new dimension? I see similarities between a binary number and for instance Fourier Transform, with each digit being a discrete function.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How is that different from writing out a vector?

[1 0 1 1 1 0]

vs

101110

Isn't it just a matter of notation and interpretation? The algebra for manipulation doesn't change, I think? There may be a deeper question than I am seeing, I am far from a mathematician.
 
  • Like
Likes entropy1
entropy1 said:
Could you view a discrete number, for instance a binary number, as a sort of orthogonal basis, where each digit position represents a new dimension? I see similarities between a binary number and for instance Fourier Transform, with each digit being a discrete function.
Yes. Since ##\mathbb{Z}_2## is a field everything is fine in ##\mathbb{Z}_2^n##, the ##n-##dimensional unit cube.
You might want to have a look on the following page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_Fourier_transform about discrete Fourier transformations which are an important tool in information theory.
 
  • Like
Likes entropy1
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top