Can a Charged Particle Spin Indefinitely in a Magnetic Field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter username
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Particle
username
Messages
226
Reaction score
2
If a charged particle experiences a force in a magnetic field would it be possible to introduce a charged particle into an magnetic field and keep it spinning around in circles indefinately whether its in a vacuum or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I should assume so, as long as the particle was moving fast enough. Sometimes when we are bored in physics, the teacher gets his big magnet out and we see how far round a paper clip will go if we throw it through the gap in the magnet. Obviously we have never had an orbiting paperclip but i believe that if the density of the flux was high and the particle moving fast enough, then it could happen.

Well, it works for gravity don't it? :wink:
 
Now all I need is a paperclip :). What if you put two charged plates perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field. Would the particle gain more kinetic energy if it is traveling round in circles (more time spent between the plates) than if it went in a strait line between the plates?
 
as long as the plates were the opposite charge to the particle. I am not sure what you mean about perpendicular to the field, a magnetic field is usually all around an object.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top