Can a Jet Plane Take Off on a Treadmill?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dalton Peters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airplanes Lift
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether a jet plane can take off while on a treadmill moving backward at the same speed as the plane's forward movement. The consensus is that the plane cannot take off because lift is generated by the speed of the aircraft relative to the air, not the ground. If the plane is stationary relative to the air, it will not achieve lift, regardless of the treadmill's motion. The confusion arises from the vague wording of the question, which leads to misunderstandings about the forces at play.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic aerodynamics, specifically lift generation.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of relative motion and reference frames.
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion as they apply to aircraft.
  • Basic physics terminology related to thrust, lift, and drag.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of lift generation in aircraft, focusing on airflow over wings.
  • Learn about relative motion and how it affects the performance of vehicles.
  • Research Newton's laws of motion and their applications in aviation.
  • Explore the concept of vectored thrust and its implications for aircraft performance.
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, aviation enthusiasts, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of flight and the principles of aerodynamics.

  • #31
To reduce this problem to its simplest terms, imagine that the velocity of the airplane and the velocity of the treadmill are equal, at zero. What happens?

The answer without all the nitpicking is no, the plane will not take off unless it is moving relative to the air it is in. If it is on a treadmill moving backwards at the same rate the plane is moving forward, it will not lift into the air. Unless it is a Harrier jump jet., or AV8, with thrust vectoring. Or an Osprey. They can take off with thrust vectoring in still air.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Brad Jensen said:
If it is on a treadmill moving backwards at the same rate the plane is moving forward
That's the ambiguous condition this thread started with. Is the plane moving forward relative to the ground or relative to the treadmill?
 
  • #33
OCR said:
This again, really... all over, again... ?
Yeah, thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nidum
  • #34
Brad Jensen said:
If it is on a treadmill moving backwards at the same rate the plane is moving forward, it will not lift into the air.
The best way to visualize this problem is to imagine that you've taken your model airplane (with properly rotating wheels) into a grocery store, set it down on the conveyor belt, and are pushing it. Can you push it against the direction of the belt? Yes, whether the belt is moving or not. What do the wheels do when you push it against the direction of the belt? They turn. If the belt is moving while you're pushing they turn faster, but that's all.

The thrust from the engines is no different than the force of your hand pushing the toy airplane: the thrust is pushing the airplane forward relative to the air. Is there any force acting on the airplane in the opposite direction to resist the engine thrust? There is if the airplane is tethered to the treadmill or if the wheel brakes are locked so that the wheels cannot turn. In this case the airplane remains at rest relative to the treadmill and its wheels do not turn. There is if the airplane is tethered to the ground; in this case the airplane remains at rest relative to the ground while the treadmill moves and the wheels turn.

However, if the airplane is not tethered and the wheels are free to spin, then there is nothing to oppose the thrust of the engines so the plane accelerates forwards relative to the air, the ground, and the treadmill. The wheels turn faster because the airplane is moving relative to the belt, that exerts no force on the airplane.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cabraham, CWatters, mfb and 2 others
  • #35
I think we've beaten this to death. We'll keep it locked.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander, berkeman and davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
12K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K