Can a Microcontroller Replace a 555 Timer for a Low Frequency Flasher?

  • Thread starter Thread starter funnyguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Timer
AI Thread Summary
Using a microcontroller instead of a 555 timer for a low frequency flasher can provide greater flexibility in timing and duty cycle adjustments, potentially making it more cost-effective. Concerns about the cost of resistors and capacitors for achieving low frequencies may be unfounded, as they are generally inexpensive. Alternatives like a Wien bridge oscillator or a PWM signal for motor control were also suggested. The discussion highlights the importance of considering various timing solutions based on project needs. Ultimately, the choice between a microcontroller, a 555 timer, or other options will depend on specific requirements and available resources.
funnyguy
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I want to build a low frequency, uneven cycle flasher somewhere around 10 seconds on, 5 seconds off. I planned on using a 555 timer and a MOSFET to drive my load, a small DC motor. Are there any other suggestions for something at low frequency? I'm just concerned at the R and C values needed for such low frequency as I might be able to buy a cheaper timer already assembled.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
funnyguy said:
I want to build a low frequency, uneven cycle flasher somewhere around 10 seconds on, 5 seconds off. I planned on using a 555 timer and a MOSFET to drive my load, a small DC motor. Are there any other suggestions for something at low frequency? I'm just concerned at the R and C values needed for such low frequency as I might be able to buy a cheaper timer already assembled.

Thanks.

Do you expect that since you need such timing control for your 555 that "the R and C values needed" will be expensive? What is the cost of one resistor and one capacitor combined?

A cheaper timer might be constructed by placing a gerbil on a rotary treadmill. You could mount a contactor near the circumference to energise a microswitch each revolution. You'd need to teach the gerbil the correct timing, and also feed him or her, so it might be cheaper to stick with the 555 timer.

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
I believe what bobbywhy is saying, is that one R and C probably aren't going to cost you that much.

Use Mouser.com to find some L and C with $ values.
http://www.mouser.com/Passive-Components/Capacitors/_/N-5g7r/
http://www.mouser.com/Passive-Components/Inductors/_/N-5gb4/ Also, you could try using an oscillator. I would suggest a Wien bridge oscillator.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien_bridge_oscillator

That way, you would buy 2 R and 2C instead of one C and one L

You would have to change the duty cycle of the Wien Bridge oscillator. I am trying to find the circuit for that...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, I didn't think they would, but I think the original documentation and formulas I had misled me. Originally, I looked at the calculations and thought that even with R values in the 100 kohm ranges I would need very large $5+ capacitors to make the high time what I needed. I see now that even with 7.5k and a 1mF cap I'll be in the range I need.
 


I would suggest considering using a microcontroller instead of a 555 timer for your low frequency flasher. This would allow for more flexibility in adjusting the timing and duty cycle, and may also be more cost-effective in the long run. Additionally, you could potentially use a pulse width modulation (PWM) signal to control the speed of the DC motor, rather than using a MOSFET. This would also give you more control over the motor's speed. Alternatively, you could consider using a different type of timer, such as a 555 timer with an adjustable resistor, or a 555 timer with a potentiometer, to achieve your desired frequency. Ultimately, the best approach will depend on your specific project requirements and resources.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top