Can a NASA Senior Physicist Agree with a Junior Physicist's Calculation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter walker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strange
AI Thread Summary
The calculation of the artificial satellite's speed at an altitude of 230 km is incorrect, as the junior physicist's estimate of 30,000 m/s is significantly higher than the expected speed of approximately 7,000 m/s. The centripetal acceleration formula, a = v^2/r, reveals a contradiction when applied to the given parameters. At such a high speed, the satellite would not maintain its altitude for long due to gravitational forces. This highlights the importance of accurate calculations in orbital mechanics. Understanding the dynamics of circular motion is crucial for satellite stability.
walker
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
So I came across a question in a quiz book the other day and I still haven't been able to answer it, so I figured I would ask some experts... Here goes...


As a NASA senior physicist, would you agree with the calculation made by a junior physicist regarding the speed of an artificial satellite, v = 3 x 10^4 m/s, assuming that it is traveling at an altitude h = 230 km above the Earth's surface where g = 9.0 m/s^2. The radius of the Earth is 6370 km.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would disagree.

For all circular motion, a = v2/r, where a is the centripetal acceleration, v is the linear velocity, and r is the radius of the circle.

Plug the numbers in, and you'll see there's a contradiction.

The satellite should be moving at roughly 7,000 m/s, not 30,000 m/s.

For more info on circular motion: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/circ.html#circ

- Warren
 
Yep,

If the sat is going at that speed and altitude, it won't be at that altitude for long.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top