Can a photon have any frequency or only certain specific?

Yaraeovento
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is a very fundamental question. I apologize for its simplicity. I did searches on the web but could not find a clear explanation.

Whenever I read about the principles of quantum physics, I always come across a statement along the lines of:
"electromagnetic energy could be emitted only in “quantized” form (i.e. restricted to discrete values rather than to a continuous set of values)"

This is my confusion: If a photon could have any frequency, than the packets of energy could have any infinite number of values. Does the quantum theory imply that photons can only have certain frequency and not other?

I would like to have a basic understanding of how the quantization is established.

Feel free to forward me to texts online if you do not feel this question is worthy of your time.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any frequency is possible and just about all frequencies are routinely observed.

Some particle interactions will only emit photons at particular frequencies, but any complex multi-particle system has so many different ways of producing electromagnetic radiation at so many different frequencies that we observe a continuous spectrum - one way or another, every frequency will be represented.
 
It can have any since it's the force carrier of electromagnetic fields. However, if it is produced by resorption of an atom it has only certain possible energies / frequencies depending on the atoms electron configuration.
 
I see. Thank you!
 
Also, if you want to know how the quantization of the electromagnetic field is established, (at least a low level version used in quantum optics), it's pretty similar to how other classical systems are made quantum mechanical, such as a mass on a spring.

In the quantum treatment of the mass on a spring, when you measure its total energy, you'll find that it comes in some number of discrete lumps of equal size, with the size depending on the frequency of the spring.

In the quantum treatment of the electromagnetic field (say inside a metal box to make things simple) If you break up the total energy of the electromagnetic field inside that box as a sum of the total energies for each frequency, you can find mathematically that at each frequency, the total energy comes in discrete lumps of equal size too. We often call these lumps "photons", though the technical explanation is a bit more subtle.

Long story short, quantum theory tells us that even though the light emitted from a single transition of the hydrogen atom would be a single photon, that photon will not necessarily have a single definite frequency. In fact, if the decay happens very fast, the energy time uncertainty principle tells us that the photon will have to have a relatively broad range of possible frequencies.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
That is really cool!
Thank you all so much for taking the time to answer such a mundane question.
Much appreciated indeed!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top