Can a piece that expands when blood flows through it decrease pressure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xfactor352
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a piece that expands when blood flows through it can decrease pressure in a tubing system. It is noted that if the flow is slow and friction losses are minimal, pressure remains constant throughout the tubing. However, if friction losses occur, pressure will decrease along the tubing, influenced by Bernoulli's principle. The concept of an expanding piece resembles the function of a pressure regulator, which also manages pressure changes. Overall, while the idea has merit, the dynamics of fluid flow and pressure regulation are complex.
xfactor352
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If i have a syringe used to pump blood through a set of tubing that becomes smaller and smaller, the pressure will obviously increase until it gets to the smallest diameter of the tubing. However, if I create a piece that expands when the blood flows through it, will this decrease the pressure?

The idea is that the blood displaces the walls of the tubing, thus reducing pressure. Is this idea physically possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Actually, if the flow is slow enough that there isn't much loss due to friction, pressure is constant throughout the tubing. If there is loss, the pressure will decrease the further along in the tubing it gets. And that's even without adding in the additional decrease in static pressure (conversion to velocity pressure) due to the speeding up of the fluid and Bernoulli's principle.

You may want to look into Bernoulli's principle actually -- it explains a lot about your question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli's_principle

However, if I create a piece that expands when the blood flows through it, will this decrease the pressure?
That sounds a lot like how a regulator works. There's more to it than that, though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressure_regulator
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top