Can a Silent Object Create a Sonic Boom?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ginseng
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An object that accelerates silently can still create a sonic boom when it breaks the sound barrier. The sonic boom is caused by shock waves generated from the object's movement through air, not by the sound produced by its propulsion system. This phenomenon occurs regardless of whether the object itself makes noise. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the physics behind sonic booms, which are related to pressure waves rather than sound generation. The inquiry led to a deeper exploration of the topic within the Physics Forums community.
Ginseng
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Call me crazy, but my fiance has been watching a lot of UFO stuff lately. I am extremely skeptical, but it put a question into my head, that I can not seem to find an answer to in my random searches on google.

Can an object that makes no sound while accelerating create a sonic boom when breaking the sound barrier?

Whenever I read about the sound barrier I find lots of answers on physics theory, calculations, examples, pictures, etc. All things that I have found refer to aircraft breaking the speed of sound. Well we all know how loud planes are, and I can understand the loud sound when a sound is generated by the aircraft itself.

But what about, theoretically, a propulsion system that is completely silent? Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

You should note that the creation of a sonic boom has nothing what-so-ever to do with propulsion system of an object. A sonic boom is a result of was is termed a shock. This shock is formed from the pressure waves created by the object simply moving through the air.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_boom#Causes for more information.
 
Thanks. I guess I just didnt read far enough down on the wiki page. :) Either way I found the Physics Forum in the process!
 
Ginseng said:
Either way I found the Physics Forum in the process!
Welcome aboard! It's good to have you here :smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
17K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
7K
Replies
136
Views
17K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top