Can a Windshield-Mounted Device Accurately Measure Car Performance Metrics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dusty8683
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculator
AI Thread Summary
The Escort Passport G-Timer is designed to mount on a windshield and measure car performance metrics like 0-60 times, quarter-mile times, peak horsepower, and g-forces. It operates using an accelerometer, which can calculate these metrics without being directly connected to the vehicle, aside from a power source. To determine horsepower, the device requires the car's weight, but other metrics can be accurately derived from the accelerometer's data. The discussion highlights the feasibility of using such technology in a compact, windshield-mounted format. Overall, the device's design leverages accelerometer technology to provide performance insights effectively.
dusty8683
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
escort offers a passport g-timer that advertises being capable of just mounting to your windshield, plugging in your power cord and calculating 0 - 60 time, quarter mile time, peak horsepower, and g-forces. is all that possible from just a windshield mounted unit not connected (other than the power cord) to your car??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the horsepower you need the weight of the car, but everything else can be calculated from an accelerometer.
 
And, yes, they do make accelerometers which could be mounted, along with the computer to motiter its output and compute the given quanities, to a windshield with only 12V input.
 
Originally posted by Integral
And, yes, they do make accelerometers which could be mounted, along with the computer to motiter its output and compute the given quanities, to a windshield with only 12V input.
I did my senior design project for THIS company testing piezoelectric polymers. They hand out these cute little piezoelectric accelerometers with leds attached to them. Shake it back and forth and watch the led blink.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top