Can an antenna work as a lamp?

AI Thread Summary
An antenna can theoretically emit light since both light and radio waves are electromagnetic (EM) waves, but practical implementation poses challenges due to the small wavelength of light. For instance, a full-wave antenna for red light at 694nm would be too small to be visible, complicating design and functionality. The concept suggests creating an array of metallic light-emitting antennas similar to computer chips, but efficiency compared to LEDs remains uncertain. Additionally, the discussion raises the question of whether lasers are more efficient than LEDs in converting electricity to light. Overall, while the idea is intriguing, significant engineering challenges and efficiency comparisons need to be addressed.
saltine
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
If Light is EM wave, and antenna can emit EM wave, then can an antenna emit light? Is this a matter of designing the antenna correctly or is there something fundamentally wrong about this reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wavelength of light is so small that an efficient light antenna would be too tiny to see - which sort of defeats the purpose.
 
Interpretation:

Suppose for emitting red light 694nm, the full-wave antenna would be 694nm. So you would fabricate an array of antenna like how computer chips are made from waffers, except it is metallic. On a waffer there would be many of these light-emitting-antennas. Suppose you do something like this, is there a way to tell whether it would be more effcient than LED or less efficient?

Is laser more efficient than LED in converting electricity to light?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top