Can an Inverted Pendulum Stand on End Indefinitely?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rotkiv4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
An inverted pendulum can theoretically stand on end indefinitely under ideal conditions without external disturbances. However, practical factors such as the uncertainty principle indicate that it will eventually fall due to inherent uncertainties in its position and momentum. The equations of motion for both inverted and hanging pendulums are similar, with the key difference being their equilibrium behaviors. Calculating the pendulum's motion involves understanding these equations and applying them to the upper half of its movement. Ultimately, while it may be possible to maintain an upright position momentarily, stability is not achievable in reality.
rotkiv4
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm working on a thing that could be simplified as a pendulum standing straight up. I've found some formulas on how a pendel moves when it's hanging on "the lower 180°" but can't figure out if it's possible to apply them on the other upper half.

So what I'm trying to calculate is how many degrees a straight up standing (small initial angle/not standing stable) is turning/falling in 0.1 seconds. My measurement says it has m=1.9kg and r= 0.42m.

Reguards // Viktor
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rotkiv4 said:
Hi!
I've found some formulas on how a pendel moves when it's hanging on "the lower 180°" but can't figure out if it's possible to apply them on the other upper half.

I guess it depends on which equations you're referring to. The equations of motion for an inverted pendulum are very similar to the equations of motion of a hanging pendulum, with the biggest difference being that the inverted pendulum tends to fall away from its equilibrium point, while the hanging pendulum falls towards it.

It's not difficult to derive these equations. Have you tried yet?

-Kerry
 
Theoretically, without vibrations or air motion, there should be an inverted pendulum position that would allow it to stand on end indefinitely. However, if you apply the uncertainty principle, specifically delta-x, delta-p <= h-bar to the pendulum mass, this uncertainty will require the pendulum to fall in a few seconds. I recall a similar problem in Quantum Mechanics class of a pencil standing on end.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top