Can Angles Be Assigned Dimension in Scientific Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HappyFeynman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
AI Thread Summary
Angles can be assigned dimensions in scientific calculations, but care must be taken when combining terms with different powers of radians. While rad^2 is dimensionless, mixing radians in even and odd powers can indicate an error in calculations. For instance, energy and angular momentum cannot be equated due to their differing dimensions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of maintaining dimensional consistency in physics equations. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate scientific analysis.
HappyFeynman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
In class, we had determined that radians are a form of a count of distance in terms of radius units. We stated this is different from other units such as m, s, etc. I am having an issue in determining whether two values can be added. Lets say we have the equation (6.7 rad^2 * m) + (3 m) = z. Since we defined radians as a count of distance, we can put it in terms such as 1 rad^2 = m^2 / m^2 = 1, so it is dimensionless. Because of this, can I add the two values to simply state that z= 9.7 m?
Relevant Equations
1 rad^2 = m^2 / m^2 =1
(6.7 rad^2 * m) + (3 m) = 9.7 m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might find this interesting: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/can-angles-assigned-dimension/.
The bottom line is that rad2 is certainly dimensionless, but if you find you are adding terms that have a mix of radians to an even power and radians to an odd power then you have very likely gone wrong. E.g. energy, ##ML^2T^{-2}##, cannot equal angular momentum, ##ML^2T^{-2}\Omega##, where ##\Omega## represents the 'angular' dimension.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top