Can Any 4th Degree Polynomial Be Expressed as a Quadratic of a Quadratic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter okkvlt
  • Start date Start date
okkvlt
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Question about quadratics of quadratics

can any 4th degree polynomial be expressed as a quadratic of a quadratic function?


or in the more general case, can any polynomial of degree 2^n be expressed as n-many quadratic functions of quadratic functions?
and given a polynomial of degree 2^n is there a way to find the coefficients of the quadratics?


i tried finding a way to reduce the 4th degree poly into a quadratic of a quadratic. but the main problem is when trying to find the coefficients that i have 5 equations in 6 unknowns, so the system to find the coefficients isn't determined. why and what does this mean?


r=(R4)X^4+(R3)X^3+(R2)X^2+(R1)X+R0

p[q[X]]=P2(Q2*X^2+Q1*X+Q0)^2+P1(Q2*X^2+Q1*X+Q0)+P0

in order for r[x] to equal p[q[x]]:

R4=(P2)(Q2)
R3=2(P2)(Q2)(Q1)
R2=(P2)(2(Q2)(Q0)+(Q1)^2)+(P1)(Q2)
R1=2(P2)(Q0)(Q1)+(P1)(Q1)
R0=(P2)(Q0)^2+(P1)(Q0)+(P0)

im wondering if i could just set one of the coefficients of either quadratic equal to zero. but even then the system is unsolveable by matrices, and I am not sure what terms are allowed to be zero.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
? Yes...? Are you really asking about composition of functions? If so, then, yes.
 
No you can't.

If it was possible then you could always take Q0=0 and Q2=1, just by absorbing these constants into p. Then, you have 5 equations in 4 unknowns.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top