Can any one give me the derivation of this series

  • Thread starter Thread starter dexterdev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Series
dexterdev
Messages
194
Reaction score
1
Hi PF,

I have 2 doubts :

1. Can anyone give me the derivation of series below :

X = 1 + 2n + 3 n^2 + 4 n^3 + .....

2. I can do this series reverse if the result is given, using Mc'laurin series, but then came doubt regarding derivation of Taylor series. How do we derive Taylor series equation actually.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "derivation" of a series?
$$X=1+2n+3n^2+4n^3+... = \sum_{i=0}^\infty (i+1)n^i$$
... under what conditions will the sum converge?

The MacLauran series is a special case of the Taylor series.
They work the same way - if you can do one, you can do the other.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series
 
If you mean "find the sum", that is typically extremely difficult. I am puzzled by your use of "Taylor's" series to "find the series" from the sum. The Taylors series is a series of functions, not a numerical series as you have here.
 
dexterdev said:
Hi PF,

I have 2 doubts :

1. Can anyone give me the derivation of series below :

X = 1 + 2n + 3 n^2 + 4 n^3 + .....

2. I can do this series reverse if the result is given, using Mc'laurin series, but then came doubt regarding derivation of Taylor series. How do we derive Taylor series equation actually.

Simon Bridge said:
What do you mean by "derivation" of a series?
$$X=1+2n+3n^2+4n^3+... = \sum_{i=0}^\infty (i+1)n^i$$
... under what conditions will the sum converge?

The MacLauran series is a special case of the Taylor series.
They work the same way - if you can do one, you can do the other.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series

HallsofIvy said:
If you mean "find the sum", that is typically extremely difficult. I am puzzled by your use of "Taylor's" series to "find the series" from the sum. The Taylors series is a series of functions, not a numerical series as you have here.

If I'm not mistaken, Dexterdev, you are trying to find a formula for the finite sum of the above-mentioned series? Sure this could be difficult. But just out of curiousity, why would you want to find the formula for this sum?
 
Vahsek said:
If I'm not mistaken, Dexterdev, you are trying to find a formula for the finite sum of the above-mentioned series? Sure this could be difficult. But just out of curiousity, why would you want to find the formula for this sum?

I want the sum because this is appearing somewhere in engineering (switching theory I believe), my friend asked for the "derivation" of series sum of infinite series.

She has its end result from the textbook ie 1/((1-n)^2) , provided |n|<1

I did the reverse using Taylor series ie from 1/((1-n)^2) , I got back the series. but how to arrive it other way?
 
dexterdev said:
Hi PF,

I have 2 doubts :

1. Can anyone give me the derivation of series below :

X = 1 + 2n + 3 n^2 + 4 n^3 + .....

2. I can do this series reverse if the result is given, using Mc'laurin series, but then came doubt regarding derivation of Taylor series. How do we derive Taylor series equation actually.

Hints:

What sort of series is ##1 + n + n^2 + n^3 + ...## for ##|n| < 1##?

If you represent the above series as a function of n, say ##S(n)##, what is its derivative ##S'(n)##?

Can you proceed from here?

Another well known way is to compute ##nX(n)## (##X(n)## represents your original series), then figure out what happens when you take ##X(n) - nX(n)## term by term. That's called the method of differences.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
970
Back
Top