Can anyone explain to me why eigenvector here is like this

sozener1
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Im supposed to find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of A

I found that eigenvalues are 2 12 and -6

then I found eigen vectors substituting -6 to lambda

and someone has told me I get 0 0 1 for eigenvector which I cannot understand why??

can anyone pleasezzzzzzzz explain why this is?
 

Attachments

  • gag.PNG
    gag.PNG
    1.6 KB · Views: 414
  • gss.PNG
    gss.PNG
    5.3 KB · Views: 458
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Did you multiply this vector with your matrix? What do you get?
Does this fit to the definition of an eigenvector?
 
mfb said:
Did you multiply this vector with your matrix? What do you get?
Does this fit to the definition of an eigenvector?

I get 0 0 0

it doesn't fit with the definition of eigenvectors

so does that mean it should be 0 0 0 instead of 0 0 1??

I mean when you try to calculate for v3 = [ v1 v2 v3]


since the last row of the matrix is 0 0 0 should v3 come out as 0?? couldn't v3 be any number??
 
sozener1 said:
I get 0 0 0
That's not what I get.

The matrix you showed in the second attachment is not A. It is [A - (-6)I]. Of course if you multiply this matrix times your eigenvector, you'll get the zero vector.
sozener1 said:
it doesn't fit with the definition of eigenvectors

so does that mean it should be 0 0 0 instead of 0 0 1??

I mean when you try to calculate for v3 = [ v1 v2 v3]


since the last row of the matrix is 0 0 0 should v3 come out as 0?? couldn't v3 be any number??

Assuming that your eigenvalue is λ and that x is an as-yet unknown eigenvector for λ, what you're doing is solving the equation Ax = λx for x. That's equivalent to solving the equation (A - λI)x = 0. In other words, of finding the kernel of the matrix A - λI. This should be something that you have already learned to do.

The kernel here should not consist of only the zero vector - an eigenvector cannot be the zero vector.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top