Can Anyone Help Identify This Series and Explain MATLAB's Incorrect Answer?

sparklingway
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have to find the "second smallest root" of the following equation :

1-x+(x^2)/(2!)^2-(x^3)/(3!)^2+(x^4)/(4!)^2+...=0

Matlab returns quite a satisfactory answer. >> p=[1/518400 -1/14400 1/1576 -1/36 1/4 -1 1]

p =

0.0000 -0.0001 0.0006 -0.0278 0.2500 -1.0000 1.0000

>> roots(p)

ans =

35.5690
-4.6796 +18.5352i
-4.6796 -18.5352i
4.1776 + 3.2154i
4.1776 - 3.2154i
1.4350

But I have been asked to identify this series as well, which I am unable to do. Can anybody help me identify this series as a function or a product of functions? Thanking anybody who answers before hand
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
But Matlab does NOT give a solution to that equation! What you have done is enter the first seven terms of the series as if it were a 6th degree polynomial. If I am understanding your question correctly, that is an infinite power sum. In fact, it looks to me like the power series for e-x and that is never 0.
 
Why would MATLAB not give a correct answer. From what I can infer, as the nth terms rises the factorial rises dramatically, therefore the fraction becomes very minuscule in value. Ten terms would be sufficient to give an answer correct to the third or fourth decimal place.

The power series of e^x is 1+x+(x^2)/(2!)+(x^3)/(3!)+...

The problem with this series is the square of the nth factorial is involved.
 
sparklingway said:
Why would MATLAB not give a correct answer.
Two reasons: (1) you're not feeding it the right problem, and (2) the companion matrix is quite ill-formed for a truncated series of order 6 or more.

Try graphing the series. You will need to be a bit creative in how you perform the summation if you want to see behavior for anything but small values of x.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top