Can anyone identify the approximation used in this solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter foldylocks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation
foldylocks
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to follow the reasoning of the last problem in the set linked below. I can't figure out what approximation they used in step 24. Thanks.

http://www.physics.fsu.edu/courses/spring08/phy5524/sol1.pdf

It looks like it might be an approximation based on a geometric series, but there is no summation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They're using the approximation ##\frac 1 {1-x} \approx 1+x##, or even more appropriately, ##1+x \approx \frac 1 {1-x}## where ##x=\frac {N-1}2 \frac {v_0} V##.
 
There is a summation at step 20.
The approximation comes in at 21-22

But you want to know how you go from $$\frac{P}{k_BT}\simeq \frac{1}{V-(N-1)v_0/2}$$ to $$\frac{P}{k_BT}\simeq \frac{1}{V-Nv_0/2}$$ ... well ##(N-1)x \simeq Nx## if ##x<<Nx## right? Presumably N is a very big number?

[edit] DH has it formally :)
 
Thanks for your help! DH, I assume that approximation is only valid for small x correct? It seems as if N is very large, then the approximation wouldn't be a good one.
 
Hmmm... I didn't check it properly.
We seem to be saying different things after all - I am pointing out that for large ##N##, ##N - 1 \approx N##.

You can get some very hokey-looking approximations in physics.
 
foldylocks said:
Thanks for your help! DH, I assume that approximation is only valid for small x correct? It seems as if N is very large, then the approximation wouldn't be a good one.
Yes, N is large, which makes step 25 valid, where N-1 is simplified to N. The assumption that makes step 24 valid is that ##Nv_0 \ll V##. In other words, this assumption says the volume excluded by all of the gas molecules is much less than the total volume of the system.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top