Can anyone please direct me to a website showcasing some famous Research Papers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rhydo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Papers Research
Rhydo
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'am young and am very excited about Physics. I would like to read the research papers written by famous physicists like Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein. I have been looking for websites which feature these papers for free, but in vain.

Can anyone please help me with a link toa website from where I can read the real papers like the one written by Stephen Hawking on Blackhole thermodynamics and the like or maybe Albert Einstein's General Relativity papers?

I' am sorry if thi sounds stupid but I really couldn't find any websites and my local library is not very well stocked.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Nobel prize has lectures online. With a bit of luck you will find one or two famous people on their list :-)

http://www.nobelprize.org/
 

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'Is It Known For Sure Infinites In QFT Are Caused Using a Continuum?'

I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
View full post »

Similar threads

Have you suffered for delay in submission of research paper?
Replies
7
Views
2K
A Can the geodesic equation be derived from the EFE in a certain limit?
Replies
40
Views
7K
Job Skills [Career] - What kind of life does a career in physics entail?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Nuclear waste and depleted uranium research paper (No math)
Replies
10
Views
2K
Physics The right physics field for me
Replies
3
Views
2K
How Can Undergrads Transition to Reading Academic Papers in Physics?
Replies
6
Views
6K
B Can somebody help me understand singularities better please?
Replies
6
Views
3K
Anyone got these papers, or a good source?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Some remarks on Einstein's 1907 paper on Relativity
Replies
12
Views
9K
Can a Computer Program Really Teach You Anything You Want to Learn?
Replies
2
Views
434

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top