Can anyone recommend an acceleration calculator for analyzing body movement?

AI Thread Summary
An individual is seeking an online calculator or Excel spreadsheet to analyze body movement, specifically to determine the time required to cover a distance with a given acceleration rate, starting from an initial velocity of zero. Users suggest automotive-related acceleration calculators, including a freeware JavaScript option from a Geocities site. The discussion includes a formula for calculating distance based on constant acceleration, emphasizing the importance of initial conditions. The need for a tool that accurately reflects the transition to maximum speed is highlighted. Overall, the conversation focuses on finding a suitable resource for detailed motion analysis.
Beale25
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi All!

I was hoping you guys might be able to point me in the right direction...

I'm after a online calculator or excel spreadsheet that will allow me to analyse how long a body will take to cover a given distance with a given acceleration rate. There are plenty of "simpler" ones out there but I need one that accounts for the initial velocity being 0 and hence the time taken to get to the max speed.

Thanks in advance for any help!

James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know the acceleration? Is is constant? If yes then:

x = \frac 1 2 a t^2 + V_0 t + x_0

Is the general realtionship.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How do we analyze collisions involving accelerating objects?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Can an object maintain uniform motion without any external force?
2
Replies
66
Views
5K
Having a hard time learning Newton's 2nd law
Replies
5
Views
2K
Calculating Force, Work, and Power Values For A Lifting Movement
Replies
16
Views
17K
Calculating Vehicle Speed based on Downforce (Aerodynamics)
Replies
8
Views
4K
Linear Algebra Can anyone recommend an advanced linear algebra book?
Replies
5
Views
3K
Having Trouble Finding G-Force of an Impact -- Details in post
Replies
6
Views
3K
Why does it take time to accelerate a bike from standstill to maximum speed?
Replies
13
Views
4K
I I need some support, please, for a gravity assist analysis
2
Replies
86
Views
7K
Calculating Maximum Velocity Electric Longboard
Replies
8
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top