Can Anything Move Beyond the Speed of Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wishiwassmart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curious
wishiwassmart
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I might be in the wrong section for this; however, I have been reading about relativity and I am left with a question. The speed of light is deemed as constant but it is at the limits of our perceptions or senses. Is it not possible, that something in fact can move beyond the speed of light, if it is free of similar trappings that are imposed upon us. For example, if it were possible to remove forces that act upon us locally, such as the gravity of our sun, solar system, nearby stars, even galaxy, would this shift the perception of c?
Sorry if this is confusing, at the moment its the best way I have of expressing this thought...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wishiwassmart said:
The speed of light is deemed as constant but it is at the limits of our perceptions or senses.
Why do you think this? We can measure the speed of light.
 
Again: welcome to physicsforums! :smile:

And to elaborate: we can in a lab, point a laser at a mirror and measure the time for the laser pulse to return next to the point of emission. With the old definitions, the speed of light is the total distance divided by the time.

In that light (pun not intended), perhaps you can re-phrase your question.
 
Doc Al said:
Why do you think this? We can measure the speed of light.
The speed of light is regarded as, judged as, or considered as constant. Light is part of our perception of everything we can observe. In sight, light is used to see. The speed of light is the fastest known speed, therefore it is at our limits of our perceptions/senses. I never stated that it was beyond our limits. I apologize I thought that part was clearly stated. I will attempt to clarify the rest of the question, which brings context to that statement.

I am questioning our ability to measure it as constant for the universe and also our ability to measure it as the fastest speed. If we use light to measure it and measure it in the same environment that we exist in, how do we know it this will hold true if it is measured and observed in an environment free of some or most of the limitations that act upon our environment? - This mainly questions constant. Is it possible that something can move faster than the speed of light, but we simply lack the means to observe it at this time? -this is the question related to light being at the limit of our perception senses. For example, how would we measure the speed of light, or even know to, if we did not have eyes?
 
harrylin said:
Again: welcome to physicsforums! :smile:

And to elaborate: we can in a lab, point a laser at a mirror and measure the time for the laser pulse to return next to the point of emission. With the old definitions, the speed of light is the total distance divided by the time.

In that light (pun not intended), perhaps you can re-phrase your question.
Thank you :)

I hope my reply to Doc helps.
 
wishiwassmart said:
The speed of light is regarded as, judged as, or considered as constant. Light is part of our perception of everything we can observe. In sight, light is used to see. The speed of light is the fastest known speed, therefore it is at our limits of our perceptions/senses.
Not really. The measurement that I sketched can be performed in a university room. The point is that we don't need to "run along" with something in order to measure its speed. We can just sit and watch like spectators who watch a car race.
[..] I am questioning our ability to measure it as constant for the universe
Another misunderstanding: we simply measure the speed. According to theory, the speed of light corresponds to a constant of nature. The theory has not been disproved.
and also our ability to measure it as the fastest speed. If we use light to measure it
In order to measure the speed of a car, one should measure the speed of a car - right?
and measure it in the same environment that we exist in, how do we know it this will hold true if it is measured and observed in an environment free of some or most of the limitations that act upon our environment?
That can be done for example by means of interplanetary measurements. According to the general theory of relativity, the speed of light isn't the exactly the same non-locally, just as you seem to suggest. And this was confirmed by measurements.
[..] how would we measure the speed of light, or even know to, if we did not have eyes?
We measure the speed of light with light detectors as well as with radio antennas. Light is a form of radio wave.

Did that help?
 

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Thread 'Hawking After 54 Years Confirmed: BH surfaces don't shrink'

Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Speed of Light Unaffected by Moving Emitter
Replies
25
Views
2K
B Why is it impossible to go faster than the speed of light?
Replies
21
Views
3K
B Doppler Shifting of Light: Simplification or Reality?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Let me ask a thing about the Speed of Light
Replies
6
Views
1K
B The One-Way Speed of Light: Speculation of a Tired Mind
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Has anyone measured the speed of light in one direction?
Replies
45
Views
6K
B Moving Faster Than Light: Are There Symmetrical Rules?
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Proving speed of light constant “c” is the same in all directions?
Replies
11
Views
1K
B What Happens When Light Meets Matter in the Universe?
Replies
17
Views
2K
I Beyond the Speed of Light: Objects Beyond the Observable Universe
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top