Can applied physicists be CFD analysts

AI Thread Summary
Graduating with an aerospace engineering degree and planning to pursue a graduate degree in applied physics, particularly plasma physics, is a strategic choice for entering the field of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Despite challenges in securing internships due to international student status, transitioning to applied physics allows for broader specialization opportunities. It is emphasized that understanding the physics behind the models is crucial, as software tools are secondary to grasping the underlying principles. Many professionals in CFD have backgrounds in applied physics, indicating that this path can lead to a successful career in CFD analysis. Focusing research on fluid sciences and plasma physics during graduate studies is seen as beneficial for entering the CFD sector. Overall, a broad educational foundation in exact sciences enhances adaptability and specialization in the job market.
HRishabh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am about to graduate with an aerospace engineering degree. I am planning to go into grad school for Applied physics(probably plasma physics), which I find very interesting. But the main reason I joined the aerospace degree was because I was interested in CFD. But since I could't land any internships nor jobs(international student so companies don't hire even with good GPA and research) I have to plan to go to grad school but I didn't find any point in doing aerospace again( you it specializes you into a particular area but I can specialize into any sector pursuing another major, like harvard has applied physics which researches on fluid mechanics) . So here is my question will I still be able to become CFD analyst after I become a applied physicist?

Any answer will be helpful!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you study CFD in grad school you will be in much better shape than if you don't.
 
Short answer: yes. We have several applied) physicists working here in CFD.

A software package is just a tool and software is not hard to learn. It is much more important to learn what you want to model: you need to understand the physics of the system to know which parameters you can tweak. A programmer may know that you can tweak something, but doesn't necessarily realize whether or not it makes any sense in the physical world.
Aside from that, educations in any exact science field are more about learning a way of thinking than about factual knowledge (at least, up to and including M.Sc, PhD is a different matter).

Basically, if you are trained more broadly you can always specialize on the job. The other way around is much, much harder.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
If you study CFD in grad school you will be in much better shape than if you don't.
I am thinking about studying CFD but there are not any university that specifically focus on CFD in US(or I haven't heard of any). I think specializing in fluid sciences in Aerospace engineering is another way but for me its worthless cause I won't be able to work in defense sector( visa status problems). I think I will be doing my grad school in applied physics focusing my research on cfd analysis. Thank you!
 
Veneficus said:
Short answer: yes. We have several applied) physicists working here in CFD.

A software package is just a tool and software is not hard to learn. It is much more important to learn what you want to model: you need to understand the physics of the system to know which parameters you can tweak. A programmer may know that you can tweak something, but doesn't necessarily realize whether or not it makes any sense in the physical world.
Aside from that, educations in any exact science field are more about learning a way of thinking than about factual knowledge (at least, up to and including M.Sc, PhD is a different matter).

Basically, if you are trained more broadly you can always specialize on the job. The other way around is much, much harder.

I am planning to do my phd. I think I will try for applied physics focusing my research on fluid science and plasma physics. That might help me to get into a CFD specific career. Thank you!
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
176
Back
Top