Can area of a triangle be 0.5(c x a) instead of 0.5(a x c)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coconut62
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The area of a triangle can be expressed as 0.5 times the magnitude of the cross-product of two vectors, represented as (1/2)||A x C|| or (1/2)||C x A||. The direction of the vectors does not affect the area calculation since both expressions yield the same magnitude. This relationship holds true regardless of the angle between the vectors, provided angle B is not specifically 90 degrees. The discussion clarifies that the right-hand rule and vector directions are not relevant to the area calculation itself. Overall, the area formula remains consistent across different vector arrangements.
coconut62
Messages
161
Reaction score
1
Please see the image attached.

Does that have anything to do with directions? The right-hand rule?
 

Attachments

  • 993936_10151648940262830_1434348128_n.jpg
    993936_10151648940262830_1434348128_n.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 520
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ca = ac, so yes.
 
Not in that figure, unless angle B is 90 degrees.
 
using the magnitude of the cross-product of two vectors to find the ar

If you mean

Area of triangle = (1/2)||A x C|| = (1/2)||C x A||

as in, using the magnitude of the cross-product of two vectors to find the area of the triangle between them, then yes.
 

Attachments

  • area.png
    area.png
    369 bytes · Views: 402
mark.watson said:
If you mean

Area of triangle = (1/2)||A x C|| = (1/2)||C x A||

as in, using the magnitude of the cross-product of two vectors to find the area of the triangle between them, then yes.

I didn't see the second part of your question. The direction of ||A x C|| or ||C x A|| doesn't matter because they have the same magnitude. That is why (1/2)||A x C|| = (1/2)||C x A|| is true.
 
Thank you very much.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top