Can AUB can be said as a relation or not between A and B sets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Huygen121
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation Sets
Huygen121
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
My question is just to ask whether the operations like:-

AUB is a relation or not?

in our book it is written that the relations of two sets should be subset of the cartesian product of two sets but i think that relations are those which connects two sets and that can be AUB(A union B) also,because it connects two sets either.

so,i want to ask whether AUB can be said as a relation or not between A and B sets
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"AUB" is a string of three symbols without any meaning, unless A, U and B get specified. That should be done where "AUB" is written, not at some random position afterwards.

because it connects two sets either.
That is not the sort of connection you need.
so,i want to ask whether AUB can be said as a relation or not between A and B sets
No.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top