Can Avogadro's Law Be Applied to a Gas with Zero Volume and Zero Molecules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sgstudent
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Avogadro's law indicates that pressure and volume are related to the number of gas moles, but it only applies when there are a significant number of particles in the system. If the volume and number of moles are both zero, the pressure cannot remain constant, as thermodynamic laws like PV = nRT do not hold in such cases. The discussion highlights that at n=0, the pressure must also be zero, leading to undefined conditions in graphs representing gas behavior. It is concluded that the graph should not touch the origin, implying that there must be a minimum number of moles for the law to apply effectively. Thus, the law is only valid when there are sufficient gas molecules present.
sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
My understanding of Avogrado's law is this: say I have a movable piston at a certain volume. When I pump air in, the pressure increases as the frequency of collision increases so the force acting on the piston increases. This would cause the movable piston to move up causing the volume to increase and causing the pressure to drop back to its initial amount.

But I was thinking if the volume of the piston was 0 with 0 moles of gas in it, the starting pressure would have to be 0. So when I pump more air into it, using Avogrado's law the pressure should remain constant. However, I don't think this is possible as now my pressure can't stay at 0 as nRT/V is always more than 0.

So how can the law hold here?

Thanks for the help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thermodynamic laws such as ##PV = nRT## are only valid in a statistical sense, when there are a large number of particles in the system (because fluctuations in the pressure, volume or temperature are small when there are a large number of particles). In the situations you describe, there are either no particles or only a few, so the laws can't be expected to hold.
 
Mute said:
Thermodynamic laws such as ##PV = nRT## are only valid in a statistical sense, when there are a large number of particles in the system (because fluctuations in the pressure, volume or temperature are small when there are a large number of particles). In the situations you describe, there are either no particles or only a few, so the laws can't be expected to hold.

Ohh so the law would only be accepted when say I have already 100Pa and I add in more air? So when drawing the graph for volume of gas versus number of moles should I touch the origin? Because when n=0 and V=0, P=0 but when I add in more gas where n>0, P would also now be greater than 0.
 
Why don't you graph V/n versus n and see what happens to the graph at 0 volume and 0 molecules?

PV = nRT applies to a gas of molecules, not to a gas that does not exist.
In other words, if you double nothing what do you get as an answer?
 
256bits said:
Why don't you graph V/n versus n and see what happens to the graph at 0 volume and 0 molecules?

PV = nRT applies to a gas of molecules, not to a gas that does not exist.
In other words, if you double nothing what do you get as an answer?

Hi 256bits when I graphed it I got an undefined number as we cannot divide a number by 0. If I were to double 0 I would still get 0. But how does this link to this here?

I would guess that I can't have n=0 then? Meaning when I draw my line it should start from slightly greater than n=0?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top