Can Avogadro's Law Be Applied to a Gas with Zero Volume and Zero Molecules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sgstudent
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Avogadro's law indicates that pressure and volume are related to the number of gas moles, but it only applies when there are a significant number of particles in the system. If the volume and number of moles are both zero, the pressure cannot remain constant, as thermodynamic laws like PV = nRT do not hold in such cases. The discussion highlights that at n=0, the pressure must also be zero, leading to undefined conditions in graphs representing gas behavior. It is concluded that the graph should not touch the origin, implying that there must be a minimum number of moles for the law to apply effectively. Thus, the law is only valid when there are sufficient gas molecules present.
sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
My understanding of Avogrado's law is this: say I have a movable piston at a certain volume. When I pump air in, the pressure increases as the frequency of collision increases so the force acting on the piston increases. This would cause the movable piston to move up causing the volume to increase and causing the pressure to drop back to its initial amount.

But I was thinking if the volume of the piston was 0 with 0 moles of gas in it, the starting pressure would have to be 0. So when I pump more air into it, using Avogrado's law the pressure should remain constant. However, I don't think this is possible as now my pressure can't stay at 0 as nRT/V is always more than 0.

So how can the law hold here?

Thanks for the help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thermodynamic laws such as ##PV = nRT## are only valid in a statistical sense, when there are a large number of particles in the system (because fluctuations in the pressure, volume or temperature are small when there are a large number of particles). In the situations you describe, there are either no particles or only a few, so the laws can't be expected to hold.
 
Mute said:
Thermodynamic laws such as ##PV = nRT## are only valid in a statistical sense, when there are a large number of particles in the system (because fluctuations in the pressure, volume or temperature are small when there are a large number of particles). In the situations you describe, there are either no particles or only a few, so the laws can't be expected to hold.

Ohh so the law would only be accepted when say I have already 100Pa and I add in more air? So when drawing the graph for volume of gas versus number of moles should I touch the origin? Because when n=0 and V=0, P=0 but when I add in more gas where n>0, P would also now be greater than 0.
 
Why don't you graph V/n versus n and see what happens to the graph at 0 volume and 0 molecules?

PV = nRT applies to a gas of molecules, not to a gas that does not exist.
In other words, if you double nothing what do you get as an answer?
 
256bits said:
Why don't you graph V/n versus n and see what happens to the graph at 0 volume and 0 molecules?

PV = nRT applies to a gas of molecules, not to a gas that does not exist.
In other words, if you double nothing what do you get as an answer?

Hi 256bits when I graphed it I got an undefined number as we cannot divide a number by 0. If I were to double 0 I would still get 0. But how does this link to this here?

I would guess that I can't have n=0 then? Meaning when I draw my line it should start from slightly greater than n=0?
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
486
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K