Can Black Holes Consume Light Without Increasing in Mass?

AI Thread Summary
Black holes can absorb energy, including gamma rays, which can contribute to their mass despite photons being massless. The concept that black holes can consume infinite amounts of energy without increasing in mass is a misconception; any absorbed energy will indeed increase the black hole's mass. The relationship between mass and energy is fundamental, as they are interchangeable according to relativity. Additionally, black holes are defined by their mass, charge, and spin, and any energy absorbed will reflect as an increase in mass. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the nature of black holes and their interactions with energy.
Jonaset
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was wondering a thing or two about black holes, now I'm not any kind of physicist or hobby astronomer for that. But can a black hole consume infinite amounts of, let's say gamma rays without increasing in mass or any other effect? However gamma rays haven no mass since they are pure energy or light?

Thank you for taking the time to answer! (PS! I googled it but couldn't find an answer)
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A black hole can only absorb what is near enough to be drawn in. A popular misconception is a black hole can absorb the universe [or the earth], which is wildly inaccurate. Only things that wander in too close to a black hole misbehave. Everything else thinks a black hole is merely another gravitating object - like a star.
 
massless particles are not necessarily massless. They have no rest mass.
So photons can still contribute to the mass of the BH.
There is no pure energy as per se. Energy and mass are essentially the same.
 
Bear in mind that photons do have momentum, defined as P = hf

One why to describe the effect would be:
Turn 1kg into photons via nuclear explosion(mixing 0.5 kg matter with 0.5kg anti-matter)
focus the radiation via a laser beam
Fire the pulse at the black hole

The laser apparatus and the black hole have now repelled each other through this exchange in momentum. The relatavistic mass change resulting from change in speed will be apparent as an increase in mass distributed between the gains in the black hole or the laser apparatus.
If the laser apparatus were equal in mass to the black hole, I expect both would be accelerated in opposite directions to a speed at which they both gain 0.5kg each- so the original 1kg is conserved.

I think this is correct, but would be interested if I'm wrong on this.
 
Last edited:
But can a black hole consume infinite amounts of, let's say gamma rays without increasing in mass or any other effect? However gamma rays haven no mass since they are pure energy or light?

"Black holes have no hair." is a famous quote about black holes [BH]. It means they are very 'simple' and display only mass, charge and spin. By "mass' is meant any energy, pressure or mass that either caused the BH to form in the first place or which were close enough to be absorbed after one formed. gamma rays are electromagnetic energy so if any were absorbed by a BH it would increase a bit to reflect the additional energy.

Here are two descriptions to get you started:


Do event horizons appear to be surrounded by all the stuff that has ever fallen in?

Simple answer...yes, BUT!...it depends on just what you mean by "surrounded' and also your frame of observer reference. One viewpoint is that everything that has ever been enclosed with the black hole event horizon is represented as information residing just outside the event horizon...maybe at Planck length outside the event horizon (per Leonard Susskind)….on a stretched horizon.

But there is a lot more to it:


from Roger Penrose:

There is no mass as we know it (inside a BH); inside, all particles have been destroyed and gravitational effects remain outside the event horizon along with a few characteristics (electric charge, spin, etc).



Watch clips of black holes colliding [simulations]

http://www.black-holes.org/explore2.html
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top