Can both of this vector combine become the following matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RyozKidz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around whether two vectors, A (ai + bj) and B (ci + dj), can combine to form a specific matrix configuration. Participants clarify that combining vectors can refer to either arranging them in columns or rows. The key to forming the desired matrix lies in understanding matrix multiplication and the relationships between the vectors and the resulting matrix. It is emphasized that any arrangement of numbers can create a matrix, but the challenge is defining how the matrix relates to the original vectors. The conversation concludes with a participant expressing gratitude for insights related to transformation matrices.
RyozKidz
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
vector A : ai+bj
vector B : ci+dj

can both of this vector combine become the following matrix?

\stackrel{a}{c} \stackrel{b}{d} or \stackrel{a}{b} \stackrel{c}{d}


hope anyone can tell me more about this..coz i search a lot a wiki there..~~
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


RyozKidz said:
vector A : ai+bj
vector B : ci+dj

can both of this vector combine become the following matrix?

\stackrel{a}{c} \stackrel{b}{d} or \stackrel{a}{b} \stackrel{c}{d}


hope anyone can tell me more about this..coz i search a lot a wiki there..~~
What do you mean by combine?
 


do you mean put vectors together in column or in row?
 


RyozKidz said:
vector A : ai+bj
vector B : ci+dj

can both of this vector combine become the following matrix?

\stackrel{a}{c} \stackrel{b}{d} or \stackrel{a}{b} \stackrel{c}{d}


hope anyone can tell me more about this..coz i search a lot a wiki there..~~
You just need to consider the definition of matrix multiplication. You want to find a matrix A such that

\left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> a\bold{i} + b\bold{j} \\<br /> c\bold{i} + d\bold{j}<br /> \end{array}\right) = A \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> \bold{i} \\<br /> \bold{j}<br /> \end{array}\right) = <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> a_{11} &amp; a_{12} \\<br /> a_{21} &amp; a_{22}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> \bold{i} \\<br /> \bold{j}<br /> \end{array}\right)

From this you should be able to work out the required components.
 


You can put numbers together any way you please and make a matrix. The question is how do you want that matrix to be related to the original vectors and what do you want to do with it?
 


I think i found the answer by the definition of the mutiplication of matrix...
Thx a lot..~
coz when i read about the article of the transformation matrix i can't get it..hehe thx
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top