Can Cauchy Sequences be Bounded? Theorem 1.4 in Introduction to Analysis

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Theorem 1.4 from "Introduction to Analysis," which states that every Cauchy sequence is bounded. Participants are examining the implications of this theorem and the assumptions required for its proof.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use existing theorems to demonstrate that Cauchy sequences are bounded, questioning whether this approach is sufficient. Other participants suggest exploring the proof of convergence for Cauchy sequences as a more engaging method. There is also discussion about the necessity of assuming completeness in the underlying space.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing guidance on how to approach the proof. There is a recognition of the need to clarify assumptions regarding completeness and the implications for proving the theorem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the completeness of the metric space when discussing Cauchy sequences and their convergence. There is an acknowledgment that the problem may impose restrictions on the use of certain theorems.

BrianMath
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Theorem 1.4: Show that every Cauchy sequence is bounded.


Homework Equations


Theorem 1.2: If a_n is a convergent sequence, then a_n is bounded.
Theorem 1.3: a_n is a Cauchy sequence \iff a_n is a convergent sequence.


The Attempt at a Solution


By Theorem 1.3, a Cauchy sequence, a_n, is a convergent sequence. By Theorem 1.2, a converging sequence must be bounded. Therefore, every Cauchy sequence is bounded.


I was just flipping through the textbook that my Analysis class will be using, "Introduction to Analysis" by Edward D. Gaughan, reading through Chapter 1. I noticed this theorem was left to an exercise, but I thought it was a bit too obvious of an answer as these two theorems in the Relevant equations were proven just before it. Is this really as simple as that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are allowed to use the theorems, then what you have suffices. However, textbooks are usually looking for you to prove without the given theorem, or prove the theorem itself. I would recommend trying to prove that all Cauchy sequences are convergent. Then you can say since all Cauchy sequences are convergent, all Cauchy sequences are bounded. That sounds like more fun, now doesn't it?
 
The problem does let you assume you are working in the reals (a complete metric space), right? If so, then yes, by all means use those theorems.

If you can't assume completeness, then you can't assume Cauchy sequences converge.
 
If you're not allowed to use completeness of the underlying space, then I would suggest you read the proof of "convergent sequences are bounded" and try to adjust that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K