Can compounds have a higher density than their component elements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PolarisNorth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density General
AI Thread Summary
To determine the density of a saltwater mixture for an experiment on buoyancy, the volume refers to the total amount of saltwater used, not the displaced volume from an object. The formula for density is mass divided by volume. The discussion also raises the question of whether compounds can have a higher density than their individual elements, suggesting that atomic structure and packing may limit density. It is noted that while structure can influence density, elements like osmium already have a high density, posing challenges for creating denser compounds. The conversation highlights the complexities of measuring density and the theoretical limits of material density.
PolarisNorth
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am doing an experiment to compare the force of buoyancy on an object by particular mixtures of saltwater. To do so, I need to first find the density. I do not have any special device for determining the density, so I decided to record my given information and solve for it using the definition of density=mass/volume.

I have a general question about an issue that I need clarification on:
I found the total mass of X mL of saltwater, but I'm not sure what volume is referring to.
Is it referring to the displaced volume on the object or just how many mL of saltwater I have?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the density, you need the volume of the X ml of saltwater whose total mass you found:

Density = (mass of stuff)/(volume of stuff)
 
Thank you. That cleared it up for me.
 
Since that question has been answered and I don't think it's worth making another thread on density; I'll ask here.

Can compounds be denser than their component elements? Could we make something stable that was denser than Osmium? Structure varies density, but perhaps the atoms in elements are already as densely packed as they can be.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top