Can conjugate images be used in place of dark field filters?

AI Thread Summary
Substituting a black spot in the center of a dark field filter with a completely black filter featuring a light-passing hole will not yield the same imaging effects, as the annulus in dark field imaging is crucial for passing high spatial frequencies. The hole only allows the DC component, which does not replicate the function of the annulus. Conjugate images are related to Fourier transforms, but they are not simply inverted forms; their relationship involves deeper mathematical principles. The discussion also touches on phase contrast imaging and matched filters, indicating a broader context of imaging techniques. Understanding these concepts is essential for effective application in microscopy and imaging technology.
Ruddiger28
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was working on some dark field filters and I was wondering if you could substitute the black spot in the centre of a dark field filter for a completely black filter with a light passing hole in the middle. Sort of an inverted dark field filter.
I seem to remember reading something like this involving conjugate images when I was doing Fourier theory a while ago.
Would the filters have the same effect? Or are conjugate images Fourier transforms of each other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a darkfield imaging setup, you cannot substitute a small hole for an annulus; the annulus passes high spatial frequencies while the hole passes the DC component. Offsetting the hole to the radius of the annulus can be acceptable, however (google: synthetic aperture radar).
 
Thank you for replying, I was afraid that was the case. So on the conjugate images point, are the two filters in this case Fourier transforms of each other? Why are they called conjugate images? Is the link between the two simply that they appear as inverted forms of each other or is there something deeper?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top