Can Consecutive Integers Minimize This Mathematical Expression?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pandaren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers
AI Thread Summary
The smallest possible value for the expression 4(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2) - (a+b+c+d)^2 is 20, achieved with four consecutive integers. A proof involves using the sum of squares formula for consecutive integers and the arithmetic mean-quadratic mean inequality. By expressing the integers as a = x, b = x+1, c = x+2, and d = x+3, the quadratic mean can be minimized. The calculations show that the minimum occurs when x = -2, confirming that 20 is indeed the smallest value.
Pandaren
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Let a, b, c and d be 4 distinct integers. Find the smallest possible value for 4(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2) - (a+b+c+d)^2 and prove that your answer is correct.

I got 20 as the smallest answer. Thats when u have a, b, c, and d as 4 consective integers, but i can't prove my answer. Can anyone help? Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pandaren said:
Let a, b, c and d be 4 distinct integers. Find the smallest possible value for 4(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2) - (a+b+c+d)^2 and prove that your answer is correct.

I got 20 as the smallest answer. Thats when u have a, b, c, and d as 4 consective integers, but i can't prove my answer. Can anyone help? Thanks :)
Without having put a lot of thought in at all, can you not just pick numbers 2 apart e.g. 1, 3, 5 and 7 and then 3 apart and prove it that way?

The Bob (2004 )
 


To prove that 20 is the smallest possible value for 4(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2) - (a+b+c+d)^2, we can use the fact that the sum of squares of consecutive integers can be expressed as (n)(n+1)(2n+1)/6, where n is the number of consecutive integers.

In this case, we have 4 consecutive integers, so n = 4. Substituting this into the formula, we get (4)(5)(9)/6 = 20.

To prove that this is the smallest possible value, we can use the concept of the arithmetic mean and quadratic mean inequality. The arithmetic mean of a set of numbers is always greater than or equal to the quadratic mean.

In this problem, the arithmetic mean is (a+b+c+d)/4, and the quadratic mean is √[(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2)/4]. Since we are trying to minimize the value of 4(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2) - (a+b+c+d)^2, we want to minimize the quadratic mean, which is √[(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2)/4].

Now, since a, b, c, and d are consecutive integers, we can write them as a = x, b = x+1, c = x+2, and d = x+3. Substituting these values into the quadratic mean, we get √[(x^2 + (x+1)^2 + (x+2)^2 + (x+3)^2)/4] = √[(6x^2 + 24x + 14)/4] = √(3x^2 + 12x + 7).

To minimize this expression, we can take the derivative and set it equal to 0. This gives us 6x + 12 = 0, or x = -2. Substituting this back into the expression, we get √(3(-2)^2 + 12(-2) + 7) = √(12 - 24 + 7) = √(-5) = undefined.

Since the quadratic mean cannot be negative, this means that the minimum value occurs when x = -2, which gives us
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top