I Can Crafts Reach 2c Relative to Me?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Abbott287287
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative
Abbott287287
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Separation speed
Simple question for you guys. Thanks in advance for the help.

If you are standing on earth with a watch and hypothetical crafts to your left and right instantly take off 180 degrees apart at the speed of light, at the 1 second mark on YOUR watch they will be 372,000 miles apart. From YOUR perspective, it seems they should be moving apart at 2c. You measure the distance they traveled at its exactly as above. You were stationary and your watch clicked one second. It seems they had to be moving apart at 2c, but that would be the upper limit as to how fast they can move away from each other from your perspective. No laws are being broken as each craft is moving at c, not above it. From each crafts perspective I know it would be totally different. Is this correct or not? If its wrong, please explain how.
VERY much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's correct, the upper limit for separation speed is ##2c##. Note that a massive spacecraft can't actually reach ##c## in your reference frame, but can get arbitrarily close to ##c##.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes FactChecker, Dale and Abbott287287
Much appreciated. Its being argued on a different forum. :smile:
 
Abbott287287 said:
and right instantly take off 180 degrees apart at the speed of light,
That’s not possible, but we can fix this without changing the basic sense of your question by specifying that their speed relative to you is not ##c## but something like ##.99c##.

If one is moving to left at speed ##v\lt c## and the other is moving to the right at the same speed, you will observe them separating at speed ##2v \lt 2c##.

However, their speed relative to one another will be ##2v/(1+v^2)## which is less than ##c##. Google for “relativistic velocity addition” to see how I get that result.

(And note that I am measuring time in seconds and distances in light-seconds so that ##c=1##. This is a handy and very common, almost universal, trick for not cluttering the equations up with a whole bunch of ##c## and ##c^2## factors)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top