Can dark matter explain the flyby anomalies?

AI Thread Summary
The flyby anomalies refer to unexpected changes in acceleration observed in spacecraft like Galileo and Cassini as they pass Earth. While the cause remains unknown, theories include interactions with dark matter, as suggested by Stephen Adler, who emphasizes strict constraints on this hypothesis due to the varying acceleration patterns. Other proposed explanations involve modifications to inertia, such as the Unruh effect, and some argue that the anomalies could simply be due to conventional physics misunderstandings, like sloppy math. The discussion highlights the need for further investigation into these anomalies, including the potential influence of external gravitational forces. Overall, the flyby anomalies continue to intrigue scientists as they explore both exotic and conventional explanations.
SF
The flyby anomalies, you may remember, are a set of fascinating data indicating that spacecraft flying past Earth undergo a strange, step-like change in their acceleration.

The Galileo, Near, Cassini and Rosetta spacecraft all seem to have been hit by this weird phenomenon and while that’s not a large number of data points, it is an impressive proportion of the few spacecraft that have flown past Earth on their way to other parts of the solar system.

Nobody knows what causes this effect but there are a growing number of fascinating ideas. For example, I’ve blogged about a Casimir force-like change in inertia. And today, Stephen Adler at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton considers the possibility that these spacecraft are banging into lumps of dark matter as they swing past the planet.

In an impressive analysis, Adler doesn’t rule out an interaction with dark matter but he does impose some severe limits on how this process might occur. The problem is that we’ve witnessed both increases and decreases in the acceleration of these spacecraft so any dark matter model would have to allow for this.

http://arxivblog.com/?p=428
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Did you completely missed the recently reported analysis by Slava Turyshev of JPL?

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/17846774.html

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Zz, Turyshev's paper was about the Pioneer Anomaly, not the Flyby Anomalies, which are distinctly different, but which might be related

Garth
 
Garth said:
Zz, Turyshev's paper was about the Pioneer Anomaly, not the Flyby Anomalies, which are distinctly different, but which might be related

Garth

Yes, I know, but I've attended several seminars on this whereby this issue has been brought up together to illustrate the "parameter space" in which any kind of definitive statement about exotic mechanisms responsible for such anomalies need to be tempered down until we know a LOT more.

zZ.
 
Some exotic explanations have been proposed as the explanation of the flyby anomaly, including the Unruh effect (McCulloch, M.E., "Can the flyby anomalies be explained by a modification of inertia?", submitted 18 Dec 2007 to arxiv.org)
Here, these flybys are modeled using a theory that assumes that inertia is caused by a form of Unruh radiation, modified by a Hubble-scale Casimir effect. ... However, these results were extremely sensitive to the Hubble constant used. As an experimental test of these ideas, it is proposed that metamaterials could be used to bend Unruh radiation around objects, possibly reducing their inertial mass.​

... and dark matter (Adler, S.L., "Can the flyby anomaly be attributed to earth-bound dark matter?", submitted 19 May 2008 to arxiv.org).
We make preliminary estimates to assess whether the recently reported flyby anomaly can be attributed to dark matter interactions. ... We discuss a number of strong constraints on the hypothesis of a dark matter explanation for the flyby anomaly. These require dark matter to be non-self-annihilating, with the dark matter scattering cross section on nucleons much larger, and the dark matter mass much lighter, than usually assumed.​

The answer is probably a lot more mundane: It is probably just sloppy math (Mbelek, J.P., "Special relativity may account for the spacecraft flyby anomalies", submitted 11 Sep 2008 to arxiv.org).
In the following, we show that SR transverse Doppler shift together with the addition of velocities are sufficient to explain the flyby anomalies. Thus, GR does not need to be questioned and the flyby anomaly is merely due to an incomplete analysis using conventional physics.

Oops.

The final paper is very short.
 
I have read a number of comments on the web asking if the moon's gravity was taken into account with this anomaly. I am sure it was but can no reference to the fact.

Was the moon's influence taken into account?
 
Back
Top