Can Deformation Energy Principles Be Applied to Nonlinear Elasticity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Päällikkö
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deformation Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the derivation of free energy of deformation in linear elasticity as presented in Landau & Lifgarbagez's "Theory of Elasticity." The author questions whether this derivation can be extended to nonlinear elasticity, noting that while some claims suggest it can, the generalization is not immediately clear. They express a desire for insights that do not rely on Cartesian coordinates and highlight a specific term that appears to be missing in the nonlinear case. The author seeks clarification on how to approach this problem and invites assistance from others familiar with the topic. Understanding the transition from linear to nonlinear elasticity remains a key focus of the inquiry.
Päällikkö
Homework Helper
Messages
516
Reaction score
11
This is a bit technical and I'm not exactly sure how to formulate my problem, but I'll try my best. I've been reading Landau & Lifgarbagez - Theory of Elasticity, and got not further than page 10, where they derive the free energy of deformation.

So, what they do is that they assume linear elasticity and Cartesian coordinates. Starting from the volumetric integral of the stress tensor times a variation in the displacement vector, they are able to show that the work related to this small change is, roughly speaking, minus the stress tensor times a variation of the strain tensor.

Ok, so what I'd like to know is if this result applies to nonlinear elasticity as well. I've seen claims that it does, citing that the proof is more or less elementary. I can't quite immediately see how the L&L approach could be generalized, though. Help anyone? Ideally I'd like to see a result without the assumption of Cartesian coordinates, but any pointers would be nice.

I've written below the version found in L&L:

\int_V \delta R dV = \int_S \sigma_{ik} \delta u_i df_k - \int_V \sigma_{ik}\frac{\partial\delta u_i}{\partial x_k} dV
Take V infinite and assume that stress vanishes at infinity. Noticing that the stress tensor is symmetric we may write
\int_V \delta R dV = -\frac{1}{2}\int_V \sigma_{ik} \delta \left(\frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_k} + \frac{\partial u_k}{\partial x_i}\right) dV = -\int_V \sigma_{ik}\delta u_{ik} dV

Thus, they conclude, \delta R = - \sigma_{ik}\delta u_{ik}.

This I don't think would work for the nonlinear case, as it's missing the term
\frac{\partial u_l}{\partial x_i}\frac{\partial u_l}{\partial x_k}


Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top