Can e^jwt be simplified to 2cos(wt) using complex exponentials?

palgun kumar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
it is given that e^jwt=cos(wt)+jsin(wt)...
but j=1 with angle 90 degrees..now by multiplying any function by j means multiplying the magnitude by 1 and phase change of 90 degree...
so,
jsin(wt)=sin(wt)*1 with angle 90 degrees
= sin(wt+90)
=cos(wt)
so can we write e^jwt=cos(wt)+cos(wt)
=2cos(wt)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
j is not 1. It is the square root of -1.
 
square root of -1 is 1 with angle of 90 degrees or 1 with angle of -90 degrees
 
palgun kumar said:
now by multiplying any function by j means multiplying the magnitude by 1 and phase change of 90 degree...
You could see it this way, if you like, but then you should be aware that sin(x) is composed of two parts with different phases! In particular

\sin(x)=\frac12\left(e^{i(x-\frac{\pi}{2})}+e^{i(-x+\frac{\pi}{2})}\right)
Note the minus sign in the second term.

Now if you advances both phases you get
i\sin(x)=\frac12\left(e^{ix}+e^{i(-x+\pi)}\right)

Which is not
\sin(x+\frac{\pi}{2})=\frac12\left(e^{ix}+e^{-ix}\right)

So this rule of thumb rule you mention isn't really working.

The explanation is: Advancing phases in the sense you have learned is not the same as multiplying with complex numbers! That only works for pure exponentials.
 
napyan said:
j=square(-1)

No it's the square root of (-1).

Usually it's given the symbol "i" but in Engineering it's quite common to use the symbol "j" instead. The reason is because in Electrical Engineering it's very often used in AC circuit analysis where the symbol "i" is already used to denote electrical current.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
876
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Back
Top