Can Electrons be Confined in a Cylinder of Negative Charges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter experimenter1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
AI Thread Summary
Electrons cannot be confined in a cylinder made of negative charges due to Earnshaw's theorem, which states that stable equilibrium cannot be achieved with electrostatic forces alone. Although the cylinder could create a potential well, the electron would not experience a net force within the container, allowing it to escape. Instead, configurations like quadrupole traps or Penning traps are more effective for confining charged particles. These traps utilize magnetic and electric fields to keep particles stable and are widely used in various scientific applications. Ultimately, while trapping a single electron is theoretically possible, it is more practical and interesting to trap ions.
experimenter1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to trap an electron in a cylinder witch is made of of negative charges. If the electron is confined, will it stay still or oscillate between the top and bottom of the cylinder? Would the charges making up the cylinder create a quantum well that the electron is stuck in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you saying that such a construction would match with a potential well?
 
Yes it can be a potential well, but according to a theorem called earnshaws theorem the electron would not be confined and escape, but is this true it seem as if the electron would have not much elsewhere to go except travel down and back in the cylinder where it is reppelled at both end of the cylinder also.
 
experimenter1 said:
Yes it can be a potential well, but according to a theorem called earnshaws theorem the electron would not be confined and escape, but is this true it seem as if the electron would have not much elsewhere to go except travel down and back in the cylinder where it is reppelled at both end of the cylinder also.

Yes, it is true that the electron would escape. If you surround the electron with a container of either charge, there is no electric potential difference (aka no electric field) within the container, so the electron never feels a force. It simply moves about as if the container were uncharged. Note that the classic example is a charged, hollow sphere with a charged particle inside. Other container shapes may repel the charged particle from certain places, but there will always be some way for the particle to escape. For example, an electron in your cylinder may be repelled from each end, but it will not feel a force in the radial direction and will simply drift towards the cylinder wall until impact.

See here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/potsph.html
 
A very common way of trapping charges is the penning trap, and it uses a homogenous static magnetic field, with a static inhomogeneous electric field. They are used for everything from measuring the mass of exotic nuclei, through to quantum computing, and storing antimatter. In a penning trap, paticles orbit in a epitrochoid.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penning_trap
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top