Can electrons enable instant data transmission across the universe?

AI Thread Summary
Electrons cannot occupy the same quantum state simultaneously, a principle known as the Pauli exclusion principle. This means that if one electron is manipulated, it cannot instantaneously affect another electron elsewhere in the universe due to their distinguishable energy states. Therefore, the idea of using electron manipulation for instant data transmission across the universe is not feasible. Each electron retains its unique properties, preventing any form of instantaneous communication based on their states.
domGT
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
As I understand, electrons cannot be on the exact same level as another one in the universe. If we could move one electron in one placed and somehow monitor another ones reaction - would it be possible to instantly transmit data anywhere in the universe?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
No.
If there would be "one electron here" and "one electron there", they could be distinguished, and have different energy states.
 
In my discussions elsewhere, I've noticed a lot of disagreement regarding AI. A question that comes up is, "Is AI hype?" Unfortunately, when this question is asked, the one asking, as far as I can tell, may mean one of three things which can lead to lots of confusion. I'll list them out now for clarity. 1. Can AI do everything a human can do and how close are we to that? 2. Are corporations and governments using the promise of AI to gain more power for themselves? 3. Are AI and transhumans...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...
Back
Top