Can Entangled Particles Still Show Interference in Quantum Experiments?

feizex
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is my first post here. I have done some reading on quantum mechanics and am curious to know more.

I know about the double slit experiment and the interference pattern produced. I have also read of entangled pairs.

My main question is:

If you have a pair of entangled particles (say an emitted photon pair, or electron pair?) and you attempt an interference experiment on one of the entangled particles, can you still perform an interference experiment with the other?

If not and the wavefunction collapses or decoheres(?) presumably the apparatus that was closest to the source will show the interference and the one further away will not?

What happens if they are both at the same distance?

As an aside, I have also read that the quantum "wavelength" for a grain of sand is shorter than it's physical diameter so you can't perform an interference experiment with it. Is that true? Doesn't that imply that anything larger than a grain of sand has a known location?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


feizex said:
If you have a pair of entangled particles (say an emitted photon pair, or electron pair?) and you attempt an interference experiment on one of the entangled particles, can you still perform an interference experiment with the other?
No, you cannot. (This is also related to the delayed choice experiments, in which interference can only be seen as encoded in the coincidences between the entangled pairs.)

feizex said:
If not and the wavefunction collapses or decoheres(?) presumably the apparatus that was closest to the source will show the interference and the one further away will not?
No, neither of them will show interference. Interference can only be seen through coincidences.

feizex said:
What happens if they are both at the same distance?
It will not change anything.

feizex said:
As an aside, I have also read that the quantum "wavelength" for a grain of sand is shorter than it's physical diameter so you can't perform an interference experiment with it. Is that true? Doesn't that imply that anything larger than a grain of sand has a known location?
That is true in practice, but not in principle. In principle, even a grain of sand could show interference.
In practice, physicists can do interference with atoms and molecules, the size of which is also much bigger than their wavelength.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top