Can equilibrium rate constant has unit of [time^-1]?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the units of equilibrium rate constants, specifically K_{AB} and K_{AC}, which are stated to have units of [time]^-1. Participants clarify that equilibrium rate constants should be dimensionless, as they are derived from the ratio of concentrations of products to reactants at equilibrium. The mean lifetime of the unstable state A is questioned, emphasizing that the units of rate constants in kinetics are typically concentration-based, not time-based. The reference to Wikipedia's explanation of rate constants reinforces the understanding that these constants are unitless when considering equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical kinetics and equilibrium concepts.
  • Familiarity with rate constants and their dimensional analysis.
  • Knowledge of concentration units (Moles/Liter).
  • Basic grasp of non-elementary reactions in chemistry.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of equilibrium constants and their units in chemical reactions.
  • Study the dimensional analysis of rate constants in both elementary and non-elementary reactions.
  • Explore the relationship between reaction rates and concentration changes over time.
  • Investigate the implications of short-lived states in chemical kinetics.
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals involved in chemical kinetics, particularly those studying reaction mechanisms and equilibrium states.

ggyyzdq
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I am having a homework problem that is statement really bothers me and I think it might be a typo.
It goes in the following:

Homework Statement


A is a short life unstable state and it is in equilibrium with B and C.
A[itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex]B
A[itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex]C

The equilibrium rate constants are K[itex]_{AB}[/itex]and K[itex]_{AC}[/itex] with units [time]^-1.

Question: what is the mean lifetime of the state A?Is this making sense?? Even for non-elementary reactions the equilibrium rate constants can only have the dimension of concentration. So I really don't know how the [time]^-1 came from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your statement:"Even for non-elementary reactions the equilibrium rate constants can only have the dimension of concentration." is wrong. see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rate_constant#Units
R ⇌ P ⟺ Keq = [P] ÷ [R] (at equilibrium) ⟺ Moles/L ÷ Moles/L ( or P/V ÷ P/V for gas phase...)
as long as there are as many product molecules (product species) as reactants, you will have [P]ⁿ/[R]ⁿ which will result in (Moles/L ÷ Moles/L)ⁿ which is unitless.
The rate of reaction of species X is, of course, d[X]/dt.
 
ggyyzdq said:
Hi all,
I am having a homework problem that is statement really bothers me and I think it might be a typo.
It goes in the following:

Homework Statement


A is a short life unstable state and it is in equilibrium with B and C.
A[itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex]B
A[itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex]C

The equilibrium rate constants are K[itex]_{AB}[/itex]and K[itex]_{AC}[/itex] with units [time]^-1.

Question: what is the mean lifetime of the state A?

Is this making sense?? Even for non-elementary reactions the equilibrium rate constants can only have the dimension of concentration. So I really don't know how the [time]^-1 came from.
If the kinetics of the reaction from A to B are described by

[tex]\frac{dB}{dt}=-\frac{dA}{dt}=k_{AB}A[/tex]

what you assess the units of the rate constant kAB to be?

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K