Can Experiments Confirm the Wave-Particle Duality of Light?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on investigating the wave-particle duality of light for an IB extended essay. Proposed experiments include shining a laser beam through a narrow slit to demonstrate wave behavior using Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, and conducting Young's double-slit experiment to observe interference patterns. Suggestions for independent and dependent variables are provided, such as the distance between slits and the resulting fringe distance. Additionally, the photoelectric effect is mentioned as a means to confirm the particle nature of light, measuring the frequency of light against the number of emitted electrons. Overall, the exploration of wave-particle duality through these experiments offers a comprehensive approach to understanding this fundamental concept in physics.
gschjetne
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
This is one of the options I've found for IB extended essay topic.
I would like to investigate and confirm the wave-particle duality of light.

As an experiment to prove the wave nature I will shine a laser beam through a narrow slit, and use Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, \Delta p \Delta x \geq \hbar

I will change the size of the slit, delta X, and measure the size of the smear when projected at length L, according to
X_L = \frac{\frac{\hbar}{\Delta x}}{\frac{h}{\lambda}}L

To prove the wave nature of light, I'm thinking of doing Young's double-slit experiment, but I have some trouble finding out what to look for. I need an independent and a dependent variable, any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My ohysics teacher told me that I couldn't do two separate experiments to prove wave-particle duality, it had to be one single experiment.

So I guess never mind about the above question :frown:
 


Wave-particle duality is a fundamental concept in physics that describes the nature of light as both a wave and a particle. This duality was first proposed by scientists such as Thomas Young and Albert Einstein, and has been extensively studied and confirmed through various experiments.

One possible option for an IB extended essay topic related to this concept could be investigating and confirming the wave-particle duality of light through experiments. The proposed experiment of shining a laser beam through a narrow slit and using Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle to measure the size of the smear at different slit sizes is a great start. This would provide evidence for the wave-like behavior of light, as the uncertainty principle is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics.

To further investigate the wave nature of light, you could also consider performing Young's double-slit experiment. This experiment involves shining a beam of light through two narrow slits and observing the resulting interference pattern. The independent variable in this experiment could be the distance between the slits, while the dependent variable could be the distance between the interference fringes on a screen placed behind the slits. This would provide evidence for the wave-like behavior of light through interference patterns.

In order to confirm the particle nature of light, you could also explore the phenomenon of photoelectric effect. This experiment involves shining light on a metal surface and measuring the resulting electrons emitted. The independent variable in this experiment could be the frequency of the light, while the dependent variable could be the number of electrons emitted. This would provide evidence for the particle-like behavior of light through the discrete emission of electrons.

Overall, investigating and confirming the wave-particle duality of light is a fascinating and complex topic that would make for a strong IB extended essay. By combining different experiments and analyzing the results, you can provide a comprehensive understanding of this fundamental concept in physics and contribute to the ongoing research in this area.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top