Can Extra Dimensions Change Our Understanding of Energy Conservation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter almo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Energy
almo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Just finish watching hangout with cern..
Thats a part when the theorist explain abt conservation of energy that seems very vague.
He explained that, with extra dimensions, we could observed that energy is not conserved. And he added that it might have relation to a lot of things, such as dark energy.
But I still don't quite understand.
I understand about the part that, we might be unable to observe high dimensions and energy from the higher dimensions. But what about, if the model of extra dimension prove to be true, is energy still the energy that we understand? How does energy, transverse from the dimensions? Will there be new forms of energy? Will the way where by energy warp space be the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could look at it like this:

In 3D, a velocity vector is <vx,vy,vz> and an objects kinetic energy would be described as:

1/2 m v^2 = 1/2 m vx^2 + 1/2 m vy^2 + 1/2 m vz^2

Now suppose we lived in a 2D world then KE = 1/2 m vx^2 + 1/2 m vy^2 for the same object.

The vz component of its KE is hidden from us.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top