Can f(n) equal f(x) in the sum of digits equation?

dapet
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
"sum of digits" equation

Let f(n) denote the sum of (all) digits of natural number n. Prove that for each natural n we can choose convenient value of natural parameter p such that the equation f(npx)=f(x) has solution in natural numbers x that doesn't contain any "9" in its notation.

Does anybody have any idea? I don't... but I hope that you do... Actually I can solve a lot of special cases on a lot of pages... but I can't solve it generally. Is there any trick or only hard work? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you handle the case where n=1111...1 ?
 
one presumes you mean in base ten as well.
 
Yes, you're right... in base ten.
 
If 30 dosen't divide n, the result is true (see Acta Arithmetica 81; Mauduit and Scharkozy's article on sum of digits, theorem 2).
You can impose lot's of conditions on x (the only thing you really need is that you have an infintly choice on it) as x is in the set {1,11,111,1111,...}

If 30 divide n, the result is true too, but i don't have reference (it's only a special technical case).
 
Sorry i have done a small confusion : the 2 cases are
* If 30 is prime with n, then, ...
* If 30 and n have a commun divisor, then ...
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top