Can f(x, t) be expressed as a function of x + ct?

The1TL
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose f: R^2 --> R is differentiable and (df/dt) = c(df/dx) for some nonzero constant c.
Prove that f(x, t) = h(x + ct) for some function h.


Homework Equations



hint: use (u, v) = (x, x+ct)

The Attempt at a Solution



df/dt = limk-->0 (f(x, x+ct+k) - f(x, x+ct))/k
multiplying this by c gives:
limk-->0 (f(x, x+ct+ck) - f(x, x+ct))/k

I'm not sure where to go from here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you required to use the basic definition of the derivative? You were given a hint which works nicely with the chain rule but you have ignored it. If u= x, v= x+ ct, then \partial f/\partial x= (\partial f/\partial u)(\partial u/\partial x)+ (\partial f/\partial v)(\partial v/\partial x)= \partial f/\partial u+ \partial f/\partial v. Similarly, \partial f/\partial t= (\partial f/\partial u)(\partial u/\partial t)+ (\partial f/\partial v)(\partial v/\partial t)= c\partial f/\partial v.

Now, the original differential equation, in terms of u and v, becomes
c\partial f/\partial v= c(\partial f/\partial u+ \partial f/\partial v).

We can now subtract c\partial f/\partial v from both sides leaving c\partial f/\partial u= 0 which says that f does not depend upon u at all, it is simply a function of v.
 
Hi The1TL! :smile:

Can you calculate ##\frac d {du}f(x(u,v), t(u,v))## with partial derivatives?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top