Can force be understood in terms of time/speed?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jocose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Physics Terms
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of force in relation to time and speed, particularly in different contexts such as space and on Earth. Participants explore how force interacts with gravity and other forces, and the implications of applying force over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a small force applied to a massive object in space results in a small movement, while the same force on Earth does not move the object due to gravity, questioning if gravity repositions the object faster than the applied force can displace it.
  • The same participant wonders if applying a small force quickly could outpace gravity's effect and whether a rapidly applied force could be considered greater than a single application of force.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the initial claims and suggests focusing on specific problems to clarify the concepts being discussed.
  • A different participant clarifies that gravity does not directly prevent movement, using the example of a book on a table to illustrate that friction is the actual force preventing movement when a small horizontal force is applied.
  • This participant also states that force does not have a rate but can have a duration, explaining that a short tap represents a short duration of applied force.
  • A later reply acknowledges the confusion and expresses gratitude for the clarification, indicating a mix-up in understanding the concepts discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the role of gravity in preventing movement and the nature of force in relation to time. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple perspectives on the relationship between force, time, and movement.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about force, gravity, and friction, as well as the definitions of terms like "rate" and "duration." These aspects remain unresolved and are subject to interpretation.

jocose
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
If there is a massive object floating in space and I tap the side of it with a relatively small force it will move said object a very small amount.

If I tried the same thing on Earth the object would not move because of gravity. I'm inferring (perhaps erroneously) that this means the object is in fact moving but gravity is repositioning the object faster than I displace it?

If this is correct what would happen if I applied a small force very quickly. Would it be possible to outpace the speed at which gravity is moving the object back into position? Would a 1 Newton tap successively applied at an extremely fast rate equal a greater force?

I know F=MA and that acceleration is the rate of change. Is it there for paradoxical to view a force being applied at a rate as the rate is built into the definition?

What is happening when a force is applied continuously such as when I am holding an object in place. Is a force being applied at a "rate"?

I'm confused by this for some reason and if anyone could better characterize what a force is in relation to time I would appreciate it. I suspect its probably confusing for the same reason elastic collisions such as in Newtons cradle are counter intuitive as they deal with infinite quantities.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm totally confused by virtually everything you've said. This doesn't sound like any kind of physics I've ever seen or heard of. Maybe you can pose a specific focusing problem involving the concepts you are wondering about, and we can help you work your way through it. Focusing problems are often an effective way of learning a subject.
 
jocose said:
If there is a massive object floating in space and I tap the side of it with a relatively small force it will move said object a very small amount.
It will accelerate the object a small amount -- it may then move forever.
If I tried the same thing on Earth the object would not move because of gravity.
That isn't true. Gravity does not prevent anything from moving (at least directly). Consider a book resting on a table. If you apply a small horizontal force to it and it doesn't move, what prevented it from moving? Not gravity: friction.

If you consider the vertical forces, still isn't gravity that keeps it from moving, it's the vertical force applied to the book by the table that keeps it from moving.
Is a force being applied at a "rate"?
Force doesn't have a rate -- but it can have a duration. A short tap is a short duration of applied force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jocose
russ_watters said:
It will accelerate the object a small amount -- it may then move forever.

That isn't true. Gravity does not prevent anything from moving (at least directly). Consider a book resting on a table. If you apply a small horizontal force to it and it doesn't move, what prevented it from moving? Not gravity: friction.

If you consider the vertical forces, still isn't gravity that keeps it from moving, it's the vertical force applied to the book by the table that keeps it from moving.

Force doesn't have a rate -- but it can have a duration. A short tap is a short duration of applied force.
Thanks Russ,

This is helpful. I've mixed several things up. I apologize for being inarticulate but as you can tell I was very confused.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K