Can Fusion Overcome Gravitational Potential Energy in White Dwarf Explosions?

leonne
Messages
163
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The explosive fusion occurs in several steps, but the ultimate result is that carbon
is fused into nickel Assuming that the entire white dwarf
is carbon that fuses to nickel, show that the energy released in the explosion
overcomes the gravitational potential energy, thus blowing apart the star.

Homework Equations


U~-GM2/R

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so iI found how much energy you get when u fuse carbon to nickel 280Mev. Not sure what to do from here. I found the efficiency to be .0018 and was thinking of using
E(nuclear)=eMc2 Would this be the energy released?
Than I just set the energy released = to the grav potential energy right?
Thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement says that the entire white dwarf is carbon fusing to nickel. How much energy would that release, given that each fusion process releases 280 MeV?

(They're clearly just going for a reasonable/approximation approach, so you're overthinking it)
 
lol always get a reply back after the homework is due. Well I figured it out, it was exacly what i said , but in the end just have to show E is greater then U
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top