Can Gas Become Solid at Absolute Zero in a Bottle?

AI Thread Summary
At absolute zero, molecular motion ceases, raising questions about the state of gas in a sealed bottle. While gases typically condense into liquids or solids at low temperatures, the transition to solid may be complicated by the vacuum created as particles condense. The discussion suggests that gases could become a Bose-Einstein condensate near absolute zero rather than a solid. Additionally, the concept of reaching absolute zero is debated, with some believing it is theoretically unattainable. The nature of energy and its relationship to matter at these extremes remains an open question in modern science.
gateman234
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ive been thinking about this for some time but can't find an answer...
gas enters a bottle at a very low pressure, and high temperature, to maximise space between particles. the bottle is then sealed off and the temperture drops to absolute zero, does the gas become solid?


Homework Equations


none?


The Attempt at a Solution



confused, if the gas turns to solid there would be a massive vacuum of space surounding it, and particles move from high pressure to low preesure. but at absolute zero particles don't move so a solid might in the first place be unabtainible
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reason particles move from high to low pressure is because they aren't being hit by other particles as much in the low pressure area, and therefore are pushed towards it by the high pressure area particles. If there is no temperature, absolute zero, there is also no motion of the particles, so a particle won't be pushed into the vacuum.

As for whether or not the gas will become a solid, I'm not entirely sure. I think that once they get very close to absolute zero they become a Bose-Einstein condensate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose_einstein_condensate"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Absolute zero of course is defined as the temperature at which all molecular motion ceases. At this point the energy contained within the atom/molecule would be 0.00 E-999... . And with the gaseous state having the most energy (Except for plasma, which is a gas heated until the energy contained within excites electrons enough to cause them to be ejected from orbit around the nucleus) and liquid state being a step down in energy from a gas and solid state containing less energy than a liquid it seems to me the gas entering said bottle will change its state to a liquid. Even Hydrogen atoms have a melting point 0f 14.01 K would release enough energy during its phase change from gas to liquid and possibly liquid to solid (Though the freezing point is unknown, but is around 14.01 K) to raise the temperature above 0 K. Now in my personal opinion (Formed by my knowledge thus far) I do not believe 0 K can be obtained (0.1 E-999 K maybe, but not truly 0 K).

To modern science we believe Einstein's relativity to be true and the law of the conservation of matter to be true. My theory is that if 0 K were achieved the energy contained within an atom or molecule would be converted into matter, which is "impossible" as of now. The other aspect is that we have yet to identify what energy "is" (Its composition and properties) and until then will always wonder about Absolute Zero and its effects.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top