Can Graphene/Nanotubes Change Mass?

sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
A new conjecture postulates that it may be possible to "create" mass through relativistic effects on leptons inside of graphene, when it is rolled up into a nanotube:

http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/25914/?p1=A4

Gee, does that imply that it could be possible to manipulate or modulate the mass of a system comprising graphene/nanotubes?
Can anyone think of a suitable mechanism to accomplish this?

Leaving aside the details of how to accomplish this for a moment, what are the further implications and applications of a system whose mass could be modulated through internal relativistic effects?
Could it be possible to achieve propellantless propulsion? Perhaps even artificial gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a mathematical analog of relativity, not an actual relativistic effect. Solid state physics has lots of phenomena that are mathematically analogous to interesting things in other fields of physics (e.g., black holes).
 
It's not the true mass of the electrons or any other particles that is being altered.

What's modified is the effective mass of the quasiparticles of the system. Quasiparticles are reflections of the low-lying degrees of freedom of the system. As the name suggests, these low-lying degrees of freedom can be modeled using a particle picture. These quasiparticles can behave like ordinary non-relativistic electrons (same charge, same spin, different mass) which is what happens in a Fermi liquid. In graphene the quasiparticles behave as massless, relativistic Dirac fermions -- which is one of the reasons what makes this material so interesting. However, these Dirac fermions are not the original electrons.

So the article is simply wrong in saying that it's the electrons which have no mass, and that the compactification of one spatial direction generates a mass term for the electrons. This is not true. It applies to the low-lying degrees of freedom of the system -- the quasiparticles.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top